Un examen de slow vs fast thinking
Un examen de slow vs fast thinking
Blog Article
The Focusing Illusion (402) “Nothing in life is as grave as you think it is when you are thinking about it.” We overvalue what’s in our mind at the moment, which is subject to priming.
If you like the current health policy, you believe its benefits are substantial and its costs more manageable than the costs of choix.
We ut want to have more, fin not at the cost of putting our own at stake, we relish our possessions more than our desire to have more.
Psychology should inform the design of risk policies that moyen the chevronné’ knowledge with the manifeste’s emotions and intuitions.
Kahneman’s thesis breaks our decision-making systems into two pieces, System 1 and System 2, which are the respective “fast” and “slow” of the title. System 1 provides inspirée judgements based je stimulus we might not even Quand conscious of receiving; it’s the snap signals that we might not even know we are acting upon.
Priming effects take many forms. If the idea of EAT is currently nous-mêmes your mind (whether or not you are conscious of it), you will Sinon quicker than usual to recognize the word SOUP when it is spoken in a whisper or presented in a blurry font.
The hip guys, the planners, believe in basically nothing - they’re all fast talk and Fait. We’ll call them the goats: they love to butt heads with you.
Predictable erreur inevitable occur if a judgement is based nous-mêmes an produit of cognitive ease or strain.
I have attempted to summarize some heuristics, biases and psychological principle that I thought would make a fascinating acclimatation to tempt a novice like me to further explore the subject.
Kahneman and others draw an analogy based je année understanding of the Müller-Lyer errements, two parallel lines with arrows at each end. Je line’s arrows cote in; the other line’s arrows centre démodé. Parce que of the Gouvernement of the arrows, the latter line appears shorter than the installer, plaisant in fact the two lines are the same length.
The most patente check against them, as Kahneman says, is from the outside: Others can perceive our errors more readily than we can. And “slow-thinking organizations,” as he puts it, can institute policies that include the monitoring of individual decisions and predictions. They can also require procedures such as checklists and “premortems,” année idea and term thought up by Gary Klein, a cognitive psychologist.
is its failure to Note evolutionary psychology. Once in a while, Kahneman alludes to System 1’s behaviour being the result of evolutionary accoutumance—and that’s fine, because it is true, almost tautologically so. Plaisant he never quite delves into speculation about why
Present bias tableau up not just in experiments, of déplacement, délicat in the real world. Especially in the United States, people egregiously undersave expérience retirement—even when they make enough money to not spend their whole paycheck nous expenses, and even when they work expérience a company that will kick in additional funds to retirement diagramme when they contribute.
He closes by stressing he does not mean to say that people are irrational. Délicat, he says, “rational” in economic terms eh a slow and fast thinking book particular meaning that ut not describe people. “Intuition economists and decision theorists, [rationality] vraiment année altogether different meaning. The only épreuve of rationality is not whether a person’s beliefs and preferences are reasonable, délicat whether they are internally consistent.